Home / India News / SC warns lawyers against 'elevating voice' in courts

SC warns lawyers against 'elevating voice' in courts

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday warned a small band of senior advocates and lawyers to forthwith rein in their tendency to boost their voice all over arguments after they in finding the courtroom disagreeing with them.

A five-judge charter bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A Okay Sikri, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan took robust exception to the techniques hired by way of the ‘shouting brigade’ and stated, “Lawyers are called the ministers of justice. They are also referred to as officers of the court. But unfortunately, a small group of lawyers raise their voice. They must understand absolutely clearly that raising their voice is not going to be tolerated. Raising the voice means either the lawyer is incompetent to present the case or he is inadequately prepared with the case.”

The cause for the cruel communicate was once supplied by way of former solicitor normal Gopal Subramanium, who expressed fear over the non-decorous way in which arguments had been being complicated by way of senior advocates and lawyers, severely harming the judiciary’s popularity. The CJI referred to arguments complicated by way of senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Dushaynt Dave and Rajeev Dhavan in the Ayodhya case on Tuesday and the style in which Dhavan argued on Wednesday for Delhi govt in its turf warfare with the Centre.

After Subramanium’s feedback, the CJI stated, “We are compelled to connect it (expression of anguish) to yesterday’s incident (when the bench expressed dissatisfaction with Dhavan’s tone and tenor of arguments in the Delhi case). Behaviour of the senior counsel was atrocious yesterday. Day before yesterday (in Ayodhya case), it was even more atrocious. “The senior suggest (Dhavan) who argued on Wednesday (in Delhi case) contradicted the opposite suggest for Delhi govt Indira Jaising. Same shopper had many suggest. Different and contradictory arguments had been complicated by way of the suggest for a similar birthday party. How does the courtroom discern what’s the stand of the birthday party? This isn’t the custom of the bar. If the bar does now not control, we will be able to be forced to control.”

Jaising stated she did not trust Dhavan’s stand and stated that she stood by way of her arguments regardless of Dhavan’s remark.

About trendadmin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons